The Republic of Heaven

American Politics and Government.

For debate and discussion of news and current events and other important issues

American Politics and Government.

Postby Leif » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:18 am

With the Iowa caucus taking place today, the 2008 presidential race has officially begun.

Here are the results from tonight:

Democrats: Obama 38% | John Edwards 30% | Hillary Clinton 29%
Republicans: Huckabee 34% | Romney 25% | Thompson 13%

What are your views? Who do you support?
User avatar
Leif
Doesn't have a uterus
 
Posts: 1751
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:53 pm

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby delta10 » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:44 am

What are your views?
My view is that the entire election system is broken. Iowa and NH going first and getting all that hype and attention is ridiculous.

How about a national caucus day in July, then vote in November?

Nah, that's too logical and sensible to ever happen.
delta10
Zalif
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Leif » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:51 am

What are your views?
My view is that the entire election system is broken. Iowa and NH going first and getting all that hype and attention is ridiculous.

How about a national caucus day in July, then vote in November?

Nah, that's too logical and sensible to ever happen.
That would make sense. The whole Iowa caucus (especially for the Democrats) is just bizarre. I don't know if I'd like having my vote known publicly...

Having said that, the Iowa caucus isn't all that important. It might give Huckabee and Obama a little extra boost of momentum, but historically it's pretty insignificant.

But you're right; the fairest situation would be a nationwide primary date.
User avatar
Leif
Doesn't have a uterus
 
Posts: 1751
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:53 pm

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Gabe » Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:31 am

I'm surprised Edwards is so high up, and even more surprised that he beat Clinton. Glad...but still surprised.
Gabe
Unicluster Theologian
 
Posts: 1566
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2003 4:34 am

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Ian » Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:47 am

I'm surprised Edwards is so high up, and even more surprised that he beat Clinton. Glad...but still surprised.
Same. After the response Edwards got in 2004 I'd assumed he had no chance, but I gather he has a resonance with the white middle classes...

Please dear god do not let Huckabee win. Please.

And Leif, I saw that Ron Paul did ok in Iowa - 10% isn't bad for someone who Fox won't talk to :P
We must build the republic of heaven in our world...

Is this heaven?...No, it's Iowa

I sell discount books, so sue me

Times are tight, and starting a band is good way to kill some time until the economy picks up
User avatar
Ian
The Frog Prince
 
Posts: 4044
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 8:34 pm
Location: The Starlite Club

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Mockingbird » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:56 pm

I'm surprised Edwards is so high up, and even more surprised that he beat Clinton. Glad...but still surprised.
I don't believe that's confirmed yet, unless the numbers came in this morning; last night they kept saying it 'looked like' Edwards beat Clinton, it was pretty close. Why don't you like her, Gabe?

Anyway, the candidates who win the Iowa caucus don't traditionally go on to win the candidacy, as Peter implied.

This year's caucus seems to have simply been a reflection of the moods of bluest and reddest of voters more than anything concrete about the candidates, with young people coming out in full force for Obama and the evangelicals for Huckabee.

I can't imagine that Obama will win the nomination if the Democrats expect to win the presidency. And while conservative America continues to surprise me in its idiocy, I can't imagine that such a man would the nomination. He believes in creationism, among other hard-right views, how can such people still exist let alone run for office...
Image
User avatar
Mockingbird
A Walking Blade
 
Posts: 2044
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:59 am
AOL: distantdeeps
Location: The only city there is

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby jessia » Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:19 pm

between the news reports i've been hearing and conversations with americans (i.e. leif), it looks like if the republicans send huckabee to run on their behalf, it'll scare a lot of the more moderate republicans into voting for the democratic party. i've been looking at wikipedia articles on the political positions of obama and clinton and i have to say i feel more comfortable with obama. but perhaps obama has the benefit of being less experienced in politics so he doesn't have a lengthy voting record to show for.

all that said, i don't vote in your country. :P

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_ ... am_Clinton
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_ ... rack_Obama

(ongoing question in my mind about electability in the democratic party, i feel like america is more willing to send a black man to office than a woman - whereas those who wouldn't vote for an african american candidate because he is black also wouldn't vote for a woman because she is a woman, there are people who would vote for a black candidate but not for a female candidate, especially some in the older generations based on old-fashionedness/inhibited sexism. what say you?)
"o stars, isn't it from you that the lover's desire for the face
of his beloved arises? doesn't his secret insight
into her pure features come from the pure constellations?"
- from rainer maria rilke's third elegy


sign up and help edit+create his dark materials wiki articles for bridgetothestars!
http://www.bridgetothestars.net/wiki/index.php

Image Image
User avatar
jessia
Sraffie Queen
 
Posts: 10999
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 5:07 am
Website: http://cuaroninspired.wordpress.com/
Location: the colonies

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Mockingbird » Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:47 pm

but perhaps obama has the benefit of being less experienced in politics so he doesn't have a lengthy voting record to show for.
The inexperienced pigeon hole is the only trap they've been able to pin Obama in, same with Clinton being 'Republican-lite.' Neither have all that much validity, I think. In reality, I don't think he has that much less experience than Hilary Clinton, unless you count her time as the President's wife as time in office.
there are people who would vote for a black candidate but not for a female candidate, especially some in the older generations based on old-fashionedness/inhibited sexism. what say you?)
See, I would guess the other way around. It basically depends on whether America is more racist or more sexist, I'm banking on more racist, I guess we'll see eventually. :wink:
Image
User avatar
Mockingbird
A Walking Blade
 
Posts: 2044
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:59 am
AOL: distantdeeps
Location: The only city there is

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Serenula » Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:48 pm

(ongoing question in my mind about electability in the democratic party, i feel like america is more willing to send a black man to office than a woman - whereas those who wouldn't vote for an african american candidate because he is black also wouldn't vote for a woman because she is a woman, there are people who would vote for a black candidate but not for a female candidate, especially some in the older generations based on old-fashionedness/inhibited sexism. what say you?)
Hmm... good point. Plenty of people are openly sexist here in Virginia, but aren't openly reacist because they can be sued (if in a position of power) or fired or harrassed.

EDIT: Oh man, Mockingbird beat me to the punch. I erased it.
User avatar
Serenula
Zalif
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:52 pm
Location: Nose in a book; mind in the clouds

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby jessia » Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:50 pm

(ongoing question in my mind about electability in the democratic party, i feel like america is more willing to send a black man to office than a woman - whereas those who wouldn't vote for an african american candidate because he is black also wouldn't vote for a woman because she is a woman, there are people who would vote for a black candidate but not for a female candidate, especially some in the older generations based on old-fashionedness/inhibited sexism. what say you?)
Hmm... good point. Plenty of people are openly sexist here in Virginia, but aren't openly reacist because they can be sued (if in a position of power) or fired or harrassed. However, Hilary Clinton also has history (with her husband having an affair during his presidency).
that kind of has nothing to do with her though...
there are people who would vote for a black candidate but not for a female candidate, especially some in the older generations based on old-fashionedness/inhibited sexism. what say you?)
See, I would guess the other way around. It basically depends on whether America is more racist or more sexist, I'm banking on more racist, I guess we'll see eventually. :wink:
but it's the thing about sexism and racism. i feel like most people who are racist know they're racist, at least a little bit. whereas people can go on being sexist (in even the littlest ways, promoting equality whilst being of the opinion that a woman can't lead the nation) without having a clue that they could be described that way.

... which is why i think obama's probably more of a winner. also, i like his policy-direction more than clinton's. protection for stockholders and telecommunications neutrality ftw.
"o stars, isn't it from you that the lover's desire for the face
of his beloved arises? doesn't his secret insight
into her pure features come from the pure constellations?"
- from rainer maria rilke's third elegy


sign up and help edit+create his dark materials wiki articles for bridgetothestars!
http://www.bridgetothestars.net/wiki/index.php

Image Image
User avatar
jessia
Sraffie Queen
 
Posts: 10999
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 5:07 am
Website: http://cuaroninspired.wordpress.com/
Location: the colonies

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Aurone » Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:09 pm

At this point, I support Obama. He's the only one I feel I can trust who'll go into the White House after the Bush mess and can start to repare the damages from over the last 8 years. I remember reading that Hilary wanted to try and win female voters in Iowa by pulling the card of "There's never been a female President and this could be a first" and I think that might lead to her downfall. Do I think there could be a Female President? Yes, but I don't think she's it.
Aurone
Gallivespian Spy
 
Posts: 299
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:21 am

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Bellerophon » Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:11 pm

Obama : Editor of Harvard Law Review :: Clinton : Failed D.C. Bar Exam

That's all I need to know to cast my vote for Obama. I'm embarrassed to admit I supported Mr. Compassionate Conservative in 2000 even though I suspected he was an idiot. Please don't hit me -- his dad was OK :oops:

I long for the good old days of Madison and Jefferson. You know, the era when superior intelligence was a prerequisite to stand for POTUS.

Tangentially, I'm happy Huckabee may be the Republican nominee. Obama would sodomize an ignoramus like him in a debate.
A man said to the universe:
"Sir, I exist!"
"However," replied the universe,
"The fact has not created in me
A sense of obligation."
User avatar
Bellerophon
Witch
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Serenula » Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:46 pm

(ongoing question in my mind about electability in the democratic party, i feel like america is more willing to send a black man to office than a woman - whereas those who wouldn't vote for an african american candidate because he is black also wouldn't vote for a woman because she is a woman, there are people who would vote for a black candidate but not for a female candidate, especially some in the older generations based on old-fashionedness/inhibited sexism. what say you?)
Hmm... good point. Plenty of people are openly sexist here in Virginia, but aren't openly reacist because they can be sued (if in a position of power) or fired or harrassed. However, Hilary Clinton also has history (with her husband having an affair during his presidency).
that kind of has nothing to do with her though...
I was just saying that I was suprised at her reaction, if anyone did that to me I would get rid of them in an instant.
User avatar
Serenula
Zalif
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:52 pm
Location: Nose in a book; mind in the clouds

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Leif » Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:56 pm

Anyway, the candidates who win the Iowa caucus don't traditionally go on to win the candidacy, as Peter implied.
Having a panda avatar doesn't automatically make me Peter! :P
And Leif, I saw that Ron Paul did ok in Iowa - 10% isn't bad for someone who Fox won't talk to
No one really expected him to have any kind of show in Iowa, so 10% isn't to bad. He has decent shot of doing well in New Hampshire, but in all honesty I don't think anyone is giving him a snowball's chance in hell against Huckabee, Romney, or Giuliani.
Tangentially, I'm happy Huckabee may be the Republican nominee. Obama would sodomize an ignoramus like him in a debate.
Absolutely. The Iowan Republicans were asked whether or not they considered themselves evangelical or born-again Christians. Out of those who are (60%, eesh), 54% voted for Huckabee, whereas only 14% of non-evangelicals voted for him. So nearly all of Huckabee's votes will come from the evangelicals, and I don't think there are enough to win him the nomination. Plus, like Jess said, if he were the Republican candidate, a whole lot of conservatives would be voting Democrat.

I loathe Huckabee. :x
User avatar
Leif
Doesn't have a uterus
 
Posts: 1751
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:53 pm

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Gabe » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:42 pm

I don't believe that's confirmed yet, unless the numbers came in this morning; last night they kept saying it 'looked like' Edwards beat Clinton, it was pretty close.
Here are the final results according to CNN.
Why don't you like her, Gabe?
Well, she'd just continue the same politics as Bill Clinton which weren't that great...I mean I'm no Clinton hater, if she gets the nomination I'll vote for her. I'd just rather see Edwards or Obama get the nomination.

As far as whether it's easier for Obama or Clinton to be elected, there definitely seems to be a distinct Hilary Clinton hate...probably a combination of sexism and general Clinton hate. My gut feeling is that Obama has the charisma and air of competence to help offset his blackness, but the American people never cease to confuzzle me. The fact that this is even an issue pisses me off.
Gabe
Unicluster Theologian
 
Posts: 1566
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2003 4:34 am

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Qu Klaani » Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:06 pm

Please dear god do not let Huckabee win. Please.
Mick Hickabee has about as much chance of being President as I have. If he gets the nod he'll destroy the republican party, which is already being torn in about six different directions. As unlikely as it is, an Obama v Huckabee race would be a dream come true, Obama would walk it.
Image
User avatar
Qu Klaani
Idi Admin
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 1:07 pm

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Bellerophon » Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:12 pm

I agree that Obama outshines Huckabee in every meaningful way, but I can't help remembering what a lot of pundits said about Reagan's joke candidacy . . .

As I posted previously, I think the matchup will be good for Obama. Nevertheless we better be careful what we wish for.
A man said to the universe:
"Sir, I exist!"
"However," replied the universe,
"The fact has not created in me
A sense of obligation."
User avatar
Bellerophon
Witch
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Pausert » Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:21 pm

Please dear god do not let Huckabee win. Please.
Mick Hickabee has about as much chance of being President as I have. If he gets the nod he'll destroy the republican party, which is already being torn in about six different directions. As unlikely as it is, an Obama v Huckabee race would be a dream come true, Obama would walk it.
Eh... Huckabee, if nominated, would have a great chance of winning. He gets all the zealously religious voters and all the voters who are racist, not to mention most of the Republican party would probably line up behind him.(Who else are they going to vote for?) I remember seeing an article about how he tries to appeal to younger voters. If that and his stupid Chuck Norris campaign do anything he'll be a solid candidate unfortunately. I rather not see him even get in a position where he can win because if he does win I can't imagine that anything good would happen.
User avatar
Pausert
Gallivespian Spy
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:09 pm

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Leif » Sat Jan 05, 2008 7:02 am

...not to mention most of the Republican party would probably line up behind him.(Who else are they going to vote for?)
I'm not so sure about that. My parents are pretty conservative and they both told me they'd vote for Obama if it came down to Obama vs. Huckabee. Though my parents aren't religious, I'm sure there are plenty of religious Republicans who feel the same way. I think pretty much the only people who want an evangelical president are the evangelicals themselves, and the stats from my earlier post suggest the same thing.

Basically, Huckabee has a slight chance of winning the nomination, but no chance of winning the presidency.
User avatar
Leif
Doesn't have a uterus
 
Posts: 1751
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:53 pm

Re: 2008 US Elections

Postby Townie » Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:23 pm

I don't wanna sound like some whinging limey, but there's more to the US political scene than elephants and donkeys.

I see the Greens are pulling out all the stops, Nader might run again. Then there's that ol' commie Brian Moore running for Prez with the Socialist Party. The Libertarian Party are up for it again as are those god fearing Constitution Party candidates. If Ron Paul doesn't get the Republican nomniation it's rumoured he might stand on a Libertarian ticket.

If Huckabee wins, his band are gonna need a bass player, aint they?

**Goes and gets bass from spare room**
"A man does not show his greatness by being at one extremity, but rather by touching both at once." - Blaise Pascal
"Better a cruel truth than a comfortable delusion" - Edward Abbey
User avatar
Townie
Village Idiot
 
Posts: 1199
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: On the rocky shores of England...


Return to “%s” The Credibility Gap

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Content © 2001-2011 BridgeToTheStars.Net.
Images from The Golden Compass movie are © New Line Cinema.
cron