one of the rules was broken!
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 9:21 pm
RULE NUMBER THREE OF STORY-TELLING: True love should always be together.
Upon first reading the conclusion of the Amber Spyglass, I was (as you can imagine) absoutely positively...upset, for lack of a better word. As in, throwing the book across the room and storming out of my bedroom in a tearful rage, cursing Mr. Pullman quite colorfully.
When I had calmed down a bit and had suffiently cleaned the stinging mascara out of my eyes (do any of you boys knows how much it hurts to sob with that stuff on? it burns!) I reread the ending again...and again...and again...now, that may seem a tad masochistic, but in truth I was looking for a loophole, someway so that Will and Lyra could be together. I found one (forgotten now), and delighted, but then upon further reflection, I realized the book would not have been the same if the protagonists had been allowed to remain together.
For one, the book obviously would not have involked the same emotional responses. Who lugs a book into a wall because true love was permitted to never be seperated? Unless you're one of those sad individuals who despises love and feelings, no one. For another, you wouldn't have understood the sacrifices Will and Lyra had to make. There wouldn't have been any sacrifices. It would have ended Happily Ever After. (Rule Two, for Story-Telling, btw)
For awhile, my good friend and I mulled over this fact. The book, which had been absolutely perfect in all other aspects, had broken on of our imaginary 'rules' for the flawless story, yet was better because of it.
Huh. That was something to ponder over.
I'm sure most of us would have liked to see Will and Lyra stay together. But, then the story we all know and love would have been quite different. So, what do you guys think? Should they have stayed together and kept the rules intact? Or does breaking all our hearts make it a better story?
Upon first reading the conclusion of the Amber Spyglass, I was (as you can imagine) absoutely positively...upset, for lack of a better word. As in, throwing the book across the room and storming out of my bedroom in a tearful rage, cursing Mr. Pullman quite colorfully.
When I had calmed down a bit and had suffiently cleaned the stinging mascara out of my eyes (do any of you boys knows how much it hurts to sob with that stuff on? it burns!) I reread the ending again...and again...and again...now, that may seem a tad masochistic, but in truth I was looking for a loophole, someway so that Will and Lyra could be together. I found one (forgotten now), and delighted, but then upon further reflection, I realized the book would not have been the same if the protagonists had been allowed to remain together.
For one, the book obviously would not have involked the same emotional responses. Who lugs a book into a wall because true love was permitted to never be seperated? Unless you're one of those sad individuals who despises love and feelings, no one. For another, you wouldn't have understood the sacrifices Will and Lyra had to make. There wouldn't have been any sacrifices. It would have ended Happily Ever After. (Rule Two, for Story-Telling, btw)
For awhile, my good friend and I mulled over this fact. The book, which had been absolutely perfect in all other aspects, had broken on of our imaginary 'rules' for the flawless story, yet was better because of it.
Huh. That was something to ponder over.
I'm sure most of us would have liked to see Will and Lyra stay together. But, then the story we all know and love would have been quite different. So, what do you guys think? Should they have stayed together and kept the rules intact? Or does breaking all our hearts make it a better story?