Page 13 of 13

PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:50 pm
by Huginn
Trillian wrote:See guys? And that's coming from a Christian. :smiley:

Who are you talking about?

PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:58 pm
by Trillian
Erm, you?

...You're a Christian, right?

(Incase you misinterpreted my post, I just meant to say that you're right in what you're saying)

PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:09 pm
by Huginn
Trillian wrote:Erm, you?

...You're a Christian, right?

(Incase you misinterpreted my post, I just meant to say that you're right in what you're saying)

Me? Well, if pressed to choose, I'd call myself an agnostic (simply because I think saying that "Oh, this is the way things are," etc. is more than a little arbitrary), but then again, I've never really cared, either. I mean, it doesn't seem like it matters. Sure, for someone who believes in higher powers that directly interfere with humanity, I guess it could make a difference, but like I said, to me, that's arbitrary (to use Christianity as an example, there's God: he just exists, with no explanation of why; to me, that makes no sense). Why not some other way? Just because? I find that inherently odd. But that's just me.

I guess that means it's not so impressive, huh?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:43 am
by All_That_Jazz
Ceph Cepheus wrote:His Dark Materials made me enormously more spiritual, because it showed a vivid and colourful idea of reality and consciousness as a form of matter, and that fascinated me and captivated me like nothing I have read before or since.


It had that same effect on me. It's funny how people characterize it as "anit-god/faith" when it is not that at all.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 2:47 pm
by Hephaestion
Bristolian Max wrote:
I'd prefer countryside/wilderness isolation myself. At least five miles between me and any sign of civilisation would be ideal.


Hmm, if there's high ground nearby make it ten miles, and I promise I'll keep my distance, hahahaha.

To Jazz; Ah goody goody! His Dark Materials was a real wake-up call for me to stop being such a miserable sap, saying everything id meaningless and we may as well just keel over if only we weren't so cowardly. I now hate the person I used to be. I have to say in trying to describe my imaginative outlook I found that the style of your avatars fit perfectly. A rather dudey coincidence if I do say so myself.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 6:41 pm
by Max
Bah, those foothills of molehills?

PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 5:34 am
by All_That_Jazz
quoi? My avatar? Foothills?! That, my friend, is Long's Peak, over 14,000 feet - I live in the foothills, at 6,000 some feet. If you think it's a foothill, you should try climbing it. :wink: :P

(actually, you really should - it's an amazing hike. When I went I saw more stars at once than I had ever seen on any other occasion - you have to start hiking by 4 or 5 AM so that you're down from the peak by noon, when the storms come in. )</non sequitur>

Anyway, glad you like it, Ceph. Being in the mountains puts me in the same mood as reading HDM. :)

PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 4:11 pm
by Max
All_That_Jazz wrote:quoi? My avatar? Foothills?! That, my friend, is Long's Peak, over 14,000 feet - I live in the foothills, at 6,000 some feet. If you think it's a foothill, you should try climbing it. :wink: :P

Oh no no no no although I can certainly see how you must have thought that, I was referring to the Mendips.

Anyway, glad you like it, Ceph. Being in the mountains puts me in the same mood as reading HDM. :)

YES. It does. Although England has no mountains. But yes, it does.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 5:56 pm
by Qu Klaani
Although England has no mountains.


...

And by England you mean everywhere south of Birmigham, right? :roll:

PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 6:44 pm
by K!rjava
I'm from Malaysia. :P To the curious adventurer, be warned: it's a sweaty kind of place.

-K'java

PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 7:02 pm
by Max
Qu Klaani wrote:
Although England has no mountains.


...

And by England you mean everywhere south of Birmigham, right? :roll:

Something has to be 1000m high to be a mountain (according to the Ordinance Survey people). Scarfell Pike [sp], the highest peak in England, is 978 or something. I've climbed it, but at the time it was all cloud from 700m or so upwards.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 8:09 pm
by Qu Klaani
Bollocks to them, theres no way Im calling a the pennines a ~*iguana*~ "hill range." Those are ~*iguana*~ mountains.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 8:26 pm
by Will
Hugh Grant said that Welsh one was a mountain..

PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 9:07 pm
by Tomsy
Will wrote:Hugh Grant said that Welsh one was a mountain..

Snowdon? It is - it's 1085 metres. ~*iguana*~ treck.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 11:47 pm
by All_That_Jazz
Mountains aren't necessarily so tall...like Mt. Washington in New Hampshire - hiking it is like hiking a 14er, but it's only 6,000 ft. It's base is at sea level though, so it's just as much of a climb (the difference is the parking lot/gift shop/restaurant at the top, instead of an extremely windy patch of rocks with a little sign-in notebook thing. :roll: ) Also, I live at around 6,000 ft, but not really on or in the mountains, just next to them. It all depends where the base is.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:21 am
by Max
abc wrote:
Will wrote:Hugh Grant said that Welsh one was a mountain..

Snowdon? It is - it's 1085 metres. ~*iguana*~ treck.

I've been up Snowdon twice. That's a mountain but.. Isn't in England. Ben Nevis of Scotland is the highest peak in GB at 1,343.8m, as you no doubt know.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:20 pm
by eniamrahc
Just to add in my little bit of nothing: Singapore has no mountains at all. :P Even though Bukit Timah Hill is quite enough to reckon with at times when you get dragged up there.